From 0fa151aa8f11628dd48ff1a2fa138d60019d5b89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Madison Scott-Clary Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:05:03 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] update from sparkleup --- writing/post-self/qoheleth/Ioan/003-c.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/writing/post-self/qoheleth/Ioan/003-c.md b/writing/post-self/qoheleth/Ioan/003-c.md index 97703413..5e23eca2 100644 --- a/writing/post-self/qoheleth/Ioan/003-c.md +++ b/writing/post-self/qoheleth/Ioan/003-c.md @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ Making eir way out to the deck, ey popped the seal on the envelope, savoring the > > Dear has mentioned your aversion to sensorium messages, and I gather from your taste in clothing and our brief meeting that you have a certain aesthetic you enjoy. I hope that this scrap of note suits you well. The paper seemed up your alley, at least. > -> You'll have to forgive Dear. It really is stretched quite thin with its gallery show, and with the increased in-clade communication, it is feeling the pressure to keep forks to a minimum, as apparently the names available are running low. (It hasn't told the rest of the clade how many illicit forks it has. I suspect they all do.) +> You'll have to forgive Dear. It really is stretched quite thin with its gallery show, and with the increased intraclade communication, it is feeling the pressure to keep forks to a minimum, as apparently there are no further names available. (It hasn't told the rest of the clade how many illicit forks it has. I suspect they all do.) > -> There is more to this that I think it is not sharing explicitly, but we've been together for a few years now, and I have my guesses. I think the intra-clade attention is not precisely welcome. Having met some of its cocladists, I'm inclined to think that some more conservative types are being less than generous with their treatment of the subject at hand. Perhaps with their information as well. +> There is more to this that I think it is not sharing explicitly, but we've been together for a few years now, and I have my guesses. I think the intraclade attention is not precisely welcome. Having met some of its cocladists, I'm inclined to think that some more conservative types are being less than generous with their treatment of the subject at hand. Perhaps with their information as well. > > All this to say that there is a reason for the fox acting the way it is. I will not apologize on Dear's behalf, it knows me better than that, but I hope an increase in transparency as to what all is going on in the family politic will help. >