From 29736fdc05c5ab5056bc1940b6139f7ef40ee5e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Madison Scott-Clary Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 20:30:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] update from sparkleup --- writing/3/terrifying/index.md | 2 +- writing/3/terrifying/intro.tex | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/writing/3/terrifying/index.md b/writing/3/terrifying/index.md index 3e0dc440..b5b115b2 100644 --- a/writing/3/terrifying/index.md +++ b/writing/3/terrifying/index.md @@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ Wherein Maddy waxes rhapsodic about how love is right at the margin of the terrifying through the lens of Time War and also Rilke. -* [ ] [Intro](intro.tex) +* [.] [Intro](intro.tex) diff --git a/writing/3/terrifying/intro.tex b/writing/3/terrifying/intro.tex index d440d5b8..dee7a249 100644 --- a/writing/3/terrifying/intro.tex +++ b/writing/3/terrifying/intro.tex @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ and does not destroy us. Every angel is terrible. \parencite[11]{duino} \end{verse} -\emph{Ein jeder Engel ist schrecklich}, he writes, and I cannot think of a prayer more powerful than one spoken from the limen of terror and beauty we call awe.}\footnotetext{I dearly love this translation \emph{except} for this word. Will, my friend, 'cry' is \emph{right there}. Who, though I cried...but alas, we come round once more to translations and translators.}. And \emph{thanks}? There is too little bound up in that word for us to hang our hats on. I've marked none of the Lord's Prayer as \emph{thanks}, despite the very nature of its praise. +\emph{Ein jeder Engel ist schrecklich}, he writes, and I cannot think of a prayer more powerful than one spoken from the limen of terror and beauty we call awe.}\footnotetext{I dearly love this translation by Will and Mary Crichton \emph{except} for this word. Will, my friend, 'cry' is \emph{right there}. So many before and after you chose it. Who, though I cried out...but alas, we come round once more to translations and translators.}. And \emph{thanks}? There is too little bound up in that word for us to hang our hats on. I've marked none of the Lord's Prayer as \emph{thanks}, despite the very nature of its praise. The second, however, is that there are categories that is misses by virtue of the way it thinks about prayer. It comes at it so literally! How could it possibly hope to encompass the headiness of ritual? The comfort of mantras? The familiarity of well-worn words that linger with us through liturgy? It is a goal-oriented, Christian (indeed, largely Protestant and Evangelical) view of prayer.