zk_html/diary/2013-02-13-1-gender-dichoto...

<!doctype html>
<html>
    <head>
        <title>Zk | 2013-02-13-1-gender-dichotomy-is-a-fairy-tale</title>
        <link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Gentium+Plus&family=Lato&family=Ubuntu+Monodisplay=swap" />
        <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/style.css?2024-05-04" />
        <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
        <meta charset="utf-8" />
    </head>
    <body>
        <main>
            <header>
                <h1>Zk | 2013-02-13-1-gender-dichotomy-is-a-fairy-tale</h1>
            </header>
            <article class="content">
                <hr />
<p>type: link
link: http://www.themarysue.com/gender-dichotomy-study/
title: Gender Dichotomy is a Fairy Tale We&rsquo;ve Been Telling Ourselves to Sleep at Night
slug: gender-dichotomy-study
date: 2013-02-13</p>
<hr />
<p>This is pretty intriguing stuff!</p>
<p>The writing style at The Marry Sue, like at Wonkette and a few other places, can occasionally get a little snarky for me (I&rsquo;ve really been trying to be more earnest overall, and I think this and the direction in which [a][s] has headed are examples of that).  Sometimes that snark works out, and sometimes it doesn&rsquo;t.  </p>
<p>Here, I&rsquo;m a little mixed, because on the one hand, it comes off as a bit strong, but on the other, it is actually pretty refreshing to see science and meta-science being done on this subject: that is, it&rsquo;s nice to see a study turn itself on its discipline and notice that, hey, the way we divide up our subjects, respondents, and what-have-you may not be as valid as we had thought, and where did that supposed validity come from, anyway?  I suppose I&rsquo;d do well to read the actual study.</p>
<p>I was pointed to this by someone on Twitter - I think @DogAsRxD? Don&rsquo;t remember!</p>
            </article>
            <footer>
                <p>Page generated on 2024-05-04</p>
            </footer>
        </main>
        <script type="text/javascript">
        document.querySelectorAll('.tag').forEach(tag => {
            let text = tag.innerText;
            tag.innerText = '';
            tag.innerHTML = `<a href="/tags.html#${text}">${text}</a>`;
        });
        </script>
    </body>
</html>
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`<!doctype html>`
			`<html>`
			`<head>`
			`<title>Zk \| 2013-02-13-1-gender-dichotomy-is-a-fairy-tale</title>`
update from sparkleup 2023-05-11 05:35:08 +00:00			`<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Gentium+Plus&family=Lato&family=Ubuntu+Monodisplay=swap" />`
update from sparkleup 2024-05-05 04:25:08 +00:00			`<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/style.css?2024-05-04" />`
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />`
			`<meta charset="utf-8" />`
			`</head>`
			`<body>`
			`<main>`
			`<header>`
			`<h1>Zk \| 2013-02-13-1-gender-dichotomy-is-a-fairy-tale</h1>`
			`</header>`
			`<article class="content">`
			`<hr />`
			`<p>type: link`
			`link: http://www.themarysue.com/gender-dichotomy-study/`
update from sparkleup 2020-06-24 07:10:07 +00:00			`title: Gender Dichotomy is a Fairy Tale We’ve Been Telling Ourselves to Sleep at Night`
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`slug: gender-dichotomy-study`
			`date: 2013-02-13</p>`
			`<hr />`
			`<p>This is pretty intriguing stuff!</p>`
update from sparkleup 2020-06-24 07:10:07 +00:00			`<p>The writing style at The Marry Sue, like at Wonkette and a few other places, can occasionally get a little snarky for me (I’ve really been trying to be more earnest overall, and I think this and the direction in which [a][s] has headed are examples of that). Sometimes that snark works out, and sometimes it doesn’t. </p>`
			<p>Here, I’m a little mixed, because on the one hand, it comes off as a bit strong, but on the other, it is actually pretty refreshing to see science and meta-science being done on this subject: that is, it’s nice to see a study turn itself on its discipline and notice that, hey, the way we divide up our subjects, respondents, and what-have-you may not be as valid as we had thought, and where did that supposed validity come from, anyway? I suppose I’d do well to read the actual study.</p>
			`<p>I was pointed to this by someone on Twitter - I think @DogAsRxD? Don’t remember!</p>`
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`</article>`
			`<footer>`
update from sparkleup 2024-05-05 04:25:08 +00:00			`<p>Page generated on 2024-05-04</p>`
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`</footer>`
			`</main>`
update from sparkleup 2020-06-24 07:10:07 +00:00			`<script type="text/javascript">`
			`document.querySelectorAll('.tag').forEach(tag => {`
			`let text = tag.innerText;`
			`tag.innerText = '';`
			tag.innerHTML = `<a href="/tags.html#${text}">${text}</a>`;
			`});`
			`</script>`
update from sparkleup 2020-04-25 04:55:06 +00:00			`</body>`
			`</html>`