<li>“7 Trips Through the Score”— may n ot need that many, but multiple (or at least slow) reading can let us focus on one layer at a time</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Reading exercise:<ul>
<li>Pick 1 of these 2 categories to pay attention to first and read, then read for the second</li>
<li>Critique tomorrow, but preview: we’re not tearing a text apart, we’re asking it questions:<ul>
<li>How did we feel the plot worked? Was there a structure? Could we follow it?</li>
<li>What was told? What was left out? How did (not) knowing make us feel?</li>
<li>What type of language usage was there? Word choice? Style usage?</li>
<li>How about emotional impact? Was the story impactful? Did the mechanics help or hiinder?</li>
<li>Was it evocative? How did the furry elements play into it? Did you want to learn more? Was it engaging?</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Be ready to summarize</li>
<li>(~10 minutes to read)</li>
<li>Someone summarize</li>
<li>Talk through each</li>
<li>Talk through how the exercise felt:<ul>
<li>Was it useful? Tiring? Enjoyable?</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Tomorrow, we’ll go through critiquing writing and actually workshop a piece — one of mine that has already been workshopped and published, so it’s just an example of critiquing for a present author without putting anyone on the spot</li>
<li>Do you want optional homework for Sunday?<ul>
<li>Write a short ~500 word snippet (or offer one already written) to go through a gentle workshopping</li>
<li>While writing, think about what we talked through today</li>
<li>Email to me, I’ll put it online for all to read in the workshop</li>