update from sparkleup

writing/3/unknown-things/mfa/communities.html

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 <p>Lagrange is, by its very nature, ungovernable. There can be no central authority other than the physical constraints of the system, for how would they enforce restrictions or protect identities and classes that were under- and non-privileged back phys-side (that is, back in the embodied world)? In-group mentality would only strengthen as such classes and identities would gravitate towards each other, no longer bound to physical location with no job or housing markets to speak of.<sup id="fnref:hopeful"><a class="footnote-ref" href="#fn:hopeful">3</a></sup></p>
 <p>Thus having localized communities spring up around both these identities/classes as well as faith would make sense. One might find a community built around liberal Christianity with a predominantly queer congregation built in, or perhaps a group of antitheist libertarians set up up camp somewhere with their shared interests and beliefs.</p>
 <p>What these communities do also shifts.</p>
-<p>At one point, it&rsquo;s stipulated that there aren&rsquo;t jobs or professions in a post-scarcity system, just intensive interests.</p>
+<p>At one point, it&rsquo;s stipulated that there aren&rsquo;t jobs or professions in a post-scarcity system, just intensive interests. Congregations might build up communities or subcommunities around these interests. To borrow from my own experience, there likely wouldn&rsquo;t be a need for a facilities committee; the meetinghouse would never age, nothing would break down. However, perhaps there would be more game nights, more art nights, more social gatherings, dinner parties, picnics: the responsibilities community-building and worship-and-ministry committees would expand to fill those roles. With no ailing physical health, the responsibilities of care committees shift to those of support for lingering mental illness, mediation for disagreements, and support for a desire to change.</p>
 <div class="footnote">
 <hr />
 <ol>