zk_html/diary/2012-11-26-4-marrying-trans...

39 lines
2.1 KiB
HTML

<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Zk | 2012-11-26-4-marrying-transsexual-woman-without-knowing</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Gentium+Plus:ital,wght@0,400;0,700;1,400;1,700&family=Lato&family=Ubuntu+Monodisplay=swap" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/style.css" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<meta charset="utf-8" />
</head>
<body>
<main>
<header>
<h1>Zk | 2012-11-26-4-marrying-transsexual-woman-without-knowing</h1>
</header>
<article class="content">
<hr />
<p>post: link
link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238663/Belgian-husband-leaves-wife-19-years-discovering-man-says-knows-good-ironing.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
title: DailyMail article on a man marrying a transsexual woman without knowing
slug: marrying-transexual-woman
date: 2012-11-26</p>
<hr />
<p>I follow a neat twitter account, <a href="http://twitter.com/transmediawatch">@TransMediaWatch</a>, which posts articles from the UK daily about gender news of all sorts, and this came up as a negative counterpoint to a more positively worded article. It&rsquo;s certainly a very poorly written article. There&rsquo;s a lot of weird phrasing that&rsquo;s just sort of, kind of, maybe trying to hide a bias, but not really succeeding, including good examples of using an adjective to objectify, as in &ldquo;the transsexual hails from&hellip;&rdquo;. It seems that the Telegraph tends to do a better job both of posting relatively okays, and posting corrections when TMW calls them out.</p>
<p>Edit: copied title corrected.</p>
</article>
<footer>
<p>Page generated on 2023-05-10</p>
</footer>
</main>
<script type="text/javascript">
document.querySelectorAll('.tag').forEach(tag => {
let text = tag.innerText;
tag.innerText = '';
tag.innerHTML = `<a href="/tags.html#${text}">${text}</a>`;
});
</script>
</body>
</html>