38 lines
1.9 KiB
HTML
38 lines
1.9 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Zk | 2012-11-26-4-marrying-transsexual-woman-without-knowing</title>
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/style.css" />
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8" />
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<main>
|
|
<header>
|
|
<h1>Zk | 2012-11-26-4-marrying-transsexual-woman-without-knowing</h1>
|
|
</header>
|
|
<article class="content">
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<p>post: link
|
|
link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2238663/Belgian-husband-leaves-wife-19-years-discovering-man-says-knows-good-ironing.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
|
|
title: DailyMail article on a man marrying a transsexual woman without knowing
|
|
slug: marrying-transexual-woman
|
|
date: 2012-11-26</p>
|
|
<hr />
|
|
<p>I follow a neat twitter account, <a href="http://twitter.com/transmediawatch">@TransMediaWatch</a>, which posts articles from the UK daily about gender news of all sorts, and this came up as a negative counterpoint to a more positively worded article. It’s certainly a very poorly written article. There’s a lot of weird phrasing that’s just sort of, kind of, maybe trying to hide a bias, but not really succeeding, including good examples of using an adjective to objectify, as in “the transsexual hails from…”. It seems that the Telegraph tends to do a better job both of posting relatively okays, and posting corrections when TMW calls them out.</p>
|
|
<p>Edit: copied title corrected.</p>
|
|
</article>
|
|
<footer>
|
|
<p>Page generated on 2020-06-24</p>
|
|
</footer>
|
|
</main>
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">
|
|
document.querySelectorAll('.tag').forEach(tag => {
|
|
let text = tag.innerText;
|
|
tag.innerText = '';
|
|
tag.innerHTML = `<a href="/tags.html#${text}">${text}</a>`;
|
|
});
|
|
</script>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|